Archive of all online content

2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005

Volume 11 Issue 3 (2015)

Embodied Information in Cognitive Tasks: Haptic Weight Sensations Affect Task Performance and Processing Style

pp. 64-76
First published on 30 September 2015 | DOI:10.5709/acp-0172-0
Kai Kaspar, Alina Vennekötter
Corresponding author:
Kai Kaspar, Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Str. 2, 50931 Cologne.
E-mail: kkaspar@uni-koeln.de
APA
Kaspar, K., & Vennekötter, A. (2015). Embodied Information in Cognitive Tasks: Haptic Weight Sensations Affect Task Performance and Processing Style. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(3), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0172-0
Abstract

Research in the field of embodied cognition showed that incidental weight sensations influence peoples’ judgments about a variety of issues and objects. Most studies found that heaviness compared to lightness increases the perception of importance, seriousness, and potency. In two experiments, we broadened this scope by investigating the impact of weight sensations on cognitive performance. In Experiment 1, we found that the performance in an anagram task was reduced when participants held a heavy versus a light clipboard in their hands. Reduced performance was accompanied by an increase in the perceived effort. In Experiment 2, a heavy clipboard elicited a specific response heuristic in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Participants showed a significant right side bias when holding a heavy clipboard in their hands. After the task, participants in the heavy clipboard condition reported to be more frustrated than participants in the light clipboard condition. In both experiments, we did not find evidence for mediated effects that had been proposed by previous literature. Overall, the results indicate that weight effects go beyond judgment formation and highlight new avenues for future research.

Keywords: embodied cognition, weight sensations, cognitive task, task performance, response heuristic

The Influence of Motor Imagery on Postural Sway: Differential Effects of Type of Body Movement and Person Perspective

pp. 77-83
First published on 30 September 2015 | DOI:10.5709/acp-0173-x
John F. Stins, Sander L. Koole, Peter J. Beek
Corresponding author:
John F. Stins, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E-mail: j.f.stins@vu.nl
APA
Stins, J. F., Schneider, I. K., Koole, S. L., & Beek, P. J. (2015). The Influence of Motor Imagery on Postural Sway: Differential Effects of Type of Body Movement and Person Perspective. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(3), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0173-x
Abstract

The present study examined the differential effects of kinesthetic imagery (first person perspective) and visual imagery (third person perspective) on postural sway during quiet standing. Based on an embodied cognition perspective, the authors predicted that kinesthetic imagery would lead to activations in movement-relevant motor systems to a greater degree than visual imagery. This prediction was tested among 30 participants who imagined various motor activities from different visual perspectives while standing on a strain gauge plate. The results showed that kinesthetic imagery of lower body movements, but not of upper body movements, had clear effects on postural parameters (sway path length and frequency contents of sway). Visual imagery, in contrast, had no reliable effects on postural activity. We also found that postural effects were not affected by the vividness of imagery. The results suggest that during kinesthetic motor imagery participants partially simulated (re-activated) the imagined movements, leading to unintentional postural adjustments. These findings are consistent with an embodied cognition perspective on motor imagery.

Keywords: motor imagery, postural control, embodied cognition

Man, You Might Look Like a Woman— If a Child Is Next to You

pp. 84-96
First published on 30 September 2015 | DOI:10.5709/acp-0174-y
Aenne A. Brielmann, Justin Gaetano, Margarita Stolarova
Corresponding author:
Margarita Stolarova, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstrasse 10, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.
E-mail: margarita.stolarova@uni-konstanz.de
APA
Brielmann, A. A., Gaetano, J., & Stolarova, M. (2015). Man, You Might Look Like a Woman-If a Child Is Next to You. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(3), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0174-y
Abstract

Gender categorization seems prone to a pervasive bias: Persons about whom null or ambiguous gender information is available are more often considered male than female. Our study assessed whether such a male-bias is present in non-binary choice tasks and whether it can be altered by social contextual information. Participants were asked to report their perception of an adult figure’s gender in three context conditions: (1) alone, (2) passively besides a child, or (3) actively helping a child (n = 10 pictures each). The response options male, female and I don’t know were provided. As a result, participants attributed male gender to most figures and rarely used the I don’t know option in all conditions, but were more likely to attribute female gender to the same adult figure if it was shown with a child. If such social contextual information was provided in the first rather than the second block of the experiment, subsequent female gender attributions increased for adult figures shown alone. Additionally, female gender attributions for actively helping relative to passive adults were made more often. Thus, we provide strong evidence that gender categorization can be altered by social context even if the subject of gender categorization remains identical.

Keywords: male-bias, gender categorization, social perception, sex, social context

The Prediction of Students’ Academic Performance With Fluid Intelligence in Giving Special Consideration to the Contribution of Learning

pp. 97-105
First published on 30 September 2015 | DOI:10.5709/acp-0175-z
Xuezhu Ren, Karl Schweizer, Tengfei Wang, Fen Xu
Corresponding author:
Fen Xu, Department of Psychology, Zhejiang SciTech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
E-mail: fenxu@zstu.edu.cn
First author's E-mail: renxz@hust.edu.cn
APA
Ren, X., Schweizer, K., Wang, T., & Xu, F. (2015). The Prediction of Students' Academic Performance With Fluid Intelligence in Giving Special Consideration to the Contribution of Learning. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(3), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0175-z
Abstract

The present study provides a new account of how fluid intelligence influences academic performance. In this account a complex learning component of fluid intelligence tests is proposed to play a major role in predicting academic performance. A sample of 2, 277 secondary school students completed two reasoning tests that were assumed to represent fluid intelligence and standardized math and verbal tests assessing academic performance. The fluid intelligence data were decomposed into a learning component that was associated with the position effect of intelligence items and a constant component that was independent of the position effect. Results showed that the learning component contributed significantly more to the prediction of math and verbal performance than the constant component. The link from the learning component to math performance was especially strong. These results indicated that fluid intelligence, which has so far been considered as homogeneous, could be decomposed in such a way that the resulting components showed different properties and contributed differently to the prediction of academic performance. Furthermore, the results were in line with the expectation that learning was a predictor of performance in school.

Keywords: individual differences fluid intelligence, complex learning, academic performance

Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory

pp. 106-117
First published on 30 September 2015 | DOI:10.5709/acp-0176-9
Marek Nieznański, Michał Obidziński, Emilia Zyskowska, Daria Niedziałkowska
Corresponding author:
Marek Nieznański, Institute of Psychology, UKSW; ul. Wóycickiego 1/3 bud. 14; 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.
E-mail: mnieznanski@wp.pl
APA
Nieznański, M., Obidziński, M., Zyskowska, E., & Niedziałkowska, D. (2015). Executive Resources and Item-Context Binding: Exploring the Influence of Concurrent Inhibition, Updating, and Shifting Tasks on Context Memory. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(3), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0176-9
Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that context memory performance decreases as a result of cognitive load. However, the role of specific executive resources availability has not been specified yet. In a dual-task experiment, participants performed three kinds of concurrent task engaging: inhibition, updating, or shifting operations. In comparison with a no-load single-task condition, a significant decrease in item and context memory was observed, regardless of the kind of executive task. When executive load conditions were compared with non-specific cognitive load conditions, a significant interference effect was observed in the case of the inhibition task. The inhibition process appears to be an aspect of executive control, which relies on the same resource as item-context binding does, especially when binding refers to associations retrieved from long-term memory.

Keywords: context memory, executive resources, inhibition, updating, shifting

Tasks financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education on the basis of the contract no. 801/P-DUN/2018 out of the funds designed for activities promoting science: Preparation and editing of English versions of articles, Financing foreign Editors-in-Chief, Dissemination of publications and increasing their accessibility to a broad range of readers, Creation of the XML conversion platform to improve the access to the articles (2018-2019). Advances in Cognitive Psychology is co-financed by the Ministry of Education and Science (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki) under the program "Rozwój czasopism naukowych," RCN/SN/0494/2021/1.

Zadania finansowane w ramach umowy 801/P-DUN/2018 ze środków Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę: Finansowanie zagranicznych redaktorów naczelnych; Przygotowanie i edycja anglojęzycznych publikacji; Upowszechnianie publikacji i ułatwianie dostępu do nich szerokiemu gronu odbiorców; Utworzenie nowej platformy do udostępniania artykułów. Advances in Cognitive Psychology jest współfinansowane przez Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki w ramach programu "Rozwój czasopism naukowych," RCN/SN/0494/2021/1.